﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Pride Centre Of Edmonton Forums / Pride Centre of Edmonton Forums / General Discussion  / Conservative Jews Allow Gay Rabbis and Unions / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.0</generator><description>Pride Centre Of Edmonton Forums</description><link>http://forums.pridecentreofedmonton.org/</link><webMaster>forums@pridecentreofedmonton.org</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:00:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Conservative Jews Allow Gay Rabbis and Unions</title><link>http://forums.pridecentreofedmonton.org/Topic519-3-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;TABLE cellSpacing=3 width="100%"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class=text&gt;&lt;DIV class="fixed leftAlign"&gt;From the New York Times - &lt;BR&gt;&lt;A class=fixed href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/07/us/07jews.html?pagewanted=print" target=_blank&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/07/us/07jews.html?pagewanted=print&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;December 7, 2006&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Conservative Jews Allow Gay Rabbis and Unions&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;By LAURIE GOODSTEIN&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The highest legal body in Conservative Judaism, the centrist movement in worldwide Jewry, &lt;BR&gt;voted yesterday to allow the ordination of gay rabbis and the celebration of same-sex &lt;BR&gt;commitment ceremonies.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The decision, which followed years of debate, was denounced by traditionalists in the &lt;BR&gt;movement as an indication that Conservative Judaism had abandoned its commitment to &lt;BR&gt;adhere to Jewish law, but celebrated by others as a long-awaited move toward full &lt;BR&gt;equality for gay people.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"We see this as a giant step forward," said Sarah Freidson, a rabbinical student and &lt;BR&gt;co-chairwoman of Keshet, a student group at the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York &lt;BR&gt;that has been pushing for change.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;But in a reflection of the divisions in the movement, the 25 rabbis on the law committee &lt;BR&gt;passed three conflicting legal opinions — one in favor of gay rabbis and unions, and two &lt;BR&gt;against.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In doing so, the committee left it up to individual synagogues to decide whether to &lt;BR&gt;accept or reject gay rabbis and commitment ceremonies, saying that either course is &lt;BR&gt;justified according to Jewish law.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"We believe in pluralism," said Rabbi Kassel Abelson, chairman of the panel, the &lt;BR&gt;Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly, at a news conference &lt;BR&gt;after the meeting at the Park Avenue Synagogue in New York. "We recognized from the very &lt;BR&gt;beginnings of the movement that no single position could speak for all members" on the &lt;BR&gt;law committee or in the Conservative movement.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In protest, four conservative rabbis resigned from the law committee, saying that the &lt;BR&gt;decision to allow gay ordination violated Jewish law, or halacha. Among them were the &lt;BR&gt;authors of the two legal opinions the committee adopted that opposed gay rabbis and &lt;BR&gt;same-sex unions.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;One rabbi, Joel Roth, said he resigned because the measure allowing gay rabbis and unions &lt;BR&gt;was "outside the pale of halachic reasoning."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;With many Protestant denominations divided over homosexuality in recent years, the &lt;BR&gt;decision by Conservative Judaism's leading committee of legal scholars will be read &lt;BR&gt;closely by many outside the movement because Conservative Jews say they uphold Jewish law &lt;BR&gt;and tradition, which includes biblical injunctions against homosexuality.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The decision is also significant because Conservative Judaism is considered the centrist &lt;BR&gt;movement in Judaism, wedged between the liberal Reform and Reconstructionist movements, &lt;BR&gt;which have accepted an openly gay clergy for more than 10 years, and the more traditional &lt;BR&gt;Orthodox, which rejects it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The move could create confusion in congregations that are divided over the issue, said &lt;BR&gt;Rabbi Jerome Epstein, executive director of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, &lt;BR&gt;which represents the movement's more than 750 synagogues with 1.5 million members in &lt;BR&gt;North America.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"Most of our congregations will not be of one mind, the same way that we were not of one &lt;BR&gt;mind," said Rabbi Epstein, also a law committee member. "Our mandate is to help &lt;BR&gt;congregations deal with this pluralism."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Some synagogues and rabbis could leave the Conservative movement, but many rabbis and &lt;BR&gt;experts cautioned that the law committee's decision was unlikely to cause a widespread &lt;BR&gt;schism.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Before the vote, some rabbis in Canada, where many Conservative synagogues lean closer to &lt;BR&gt;Orthodoxy than in the United States, threatened to break with the movement.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;But Jonathan D. Sarna, a professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University, &lt;BR&gt;said: "I find it hard to buy the idea that this change, which has been widely expected, &lt;BR&gt;will lead anybody to leave, because synagogues that don't want to make changes will &lt;BR&gt;simply point to the rulings that will allow them not to make any changes. This is not &lt;BR&gt;like a papal edict."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The question of whether to admit and ordain openly gay rabbinic students will now be &lt;BR&gt;taken up by the movement's seminaries. The University of Judaism, in Los Angeles, has &lt;BR&gt;already signaled its support, said Rabbi Elliot Dorff, its rector and the vice chairman &lt;BR&gt;of the law committee. He co-wrote the legal opinion allowing gay ordination and unions &lt;BR&gt;that passed on Wednesday.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The Jewish Theological Seminary in New York, the flagship school in Conservative Judaism, &lt;BR&gt;will take up the issue in meetings of the faculty, the students and the trustees in the &lt;BR&gt;next few months, Chancellor-elect Arnold Eisen said in an interview. Mr. Eisen said he &lt;BR&gt;personally favored ordaining gay rabbis as long as it was permissible according to Jewish &lt;BR&gt;law and the faculty approved.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"I've been asking the faculty, and time and again I got the same answer," Mr. Eisen said. &lt;BR&gt;"People don't know what they themselves think, and they don't know what their colleagues &lt;BR&gt;are thinking. There's never been a discussion like this before about this issue."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The law committee has passed contradictory rulings before, on issues like whether it is &lt;BR&gt;permissible to drive to synagogue on the Sabbath. But the opinions it approved on &lt;BR&gt;Wednesday reflect the law committee's split on homosexuality.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The one written by Rabbi Roth upholds the prohibition on gay rabbis that the committee &lt;BR&gt;passed overwhelmingly in 1992. Another rebuts the idea that homosexuality is biologically &lt;BR&gt;ingrained in every case, and suggests that some gay people could undergo "reparative &lt;BR&gt;therapy" to change their sexuality.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The ruling accepting gay rabbis is itself a compromise. It favors ordaining gay rabbis &lt;BR&gt;and blessing same-sex unions, as long as the men do not practice sodomy.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Committee members said that, in practice, it is a prohibition that will never be policed. &lt;BR&gt;The ruling was intended to open the door to gay people while conforming to rabbinic &lt;BR&gt;interpretations of the biblical passage in Leviticus which says, "Do not lie with a male &lt;BR&gt;as one lies with a woman; it is an abomination."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The committee also rejected two measures that argued for a complete lifting of the &lt;BR&gt;prohibition on homosexuality, after deciding that both amounted to a "fix" of existing &lt;BR&gt;Jewish law, a higher level of change that requires 13 votes to pass, which they did not &lt;BR&gt;receive.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Rabbi Gordon Tucker, the author of one of the rejected opinions, said he was satisfied &lt;BR&gt;with the compromise measure. "In effect, there isn't any real practical difference," he &lt;BR&gt;said.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The Conservative movement was once the dominant stream in American Judaism but is now &lt;BR&gt;second in numbers to the Reform movement. Conservative Judaism has lost members in the &lt;BR&gt;last two decades to branches on the left and the right. Pamela S. Nadell, a professor of &lt;BR&gt;history and director of the Jewish Studies program at American University, said, "The &lt;BR&gt;conservative movement is wrestling with the whole question of how it defines itself, &lt;BR&gt;whether it still defines itself as a halachic movement, and that's why there was so much &lt;BR&gt;debate and angst over this." &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:39:52 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>serena</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>